http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hF2LSjMlC4I"If you can't beat 'em, join 'em"...wow, isn't that the truth! I just watched this video on
How do your students learn? While they will they more than likely following one or more of Howard Gardner learning styles: musical, spatial, bodily-kinisthic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, linguistic, naturalist - chances are if they were born in the past 10-15 years they will be a
DIGITAL learner.
The video presents shocking facts like:
today's college students spend
- 10,000+ hours playing video games.
- 10,000+ hours talking on cellphones
- 20,000+ hours watching TV
today's children and teens
- spend 2.75 hours a week on home computers
The video asks the question,
how much richness does your curriculum provide? Do your students remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create?
Today's teens were born into a digital world where they expect to be able to create, consume, remix and share material with each other.
So why not use technology that our students love to CREATE, ENGAGE, and TEACH more effectively?The video also points out that digital learners have sent and received over 200,000 emails or IM's by the time they graduate college.
It suggests to consider using the following for teaching:
- wiki's
- blog's
- podcasts
- online collaboration, testing, learning
- web-cams
- GPS
- geocaching games
- GIS
- google earth
- webquests
- e-folios
- virtual manipulatives, pen-pals, tours
- writing
- reading
- reflection
Here was the real question in the simplest terms:
Since your students already know how to use this technology why aren't you using it to teach?The video suggested using cellphones to teach: language, poetry, literature, public speaking, storytelling, math, geography and writing.
Text messaging to be used for pop quizzes, student polls, spelling bees, math experiments, science experiments, book reports, peer tutoring, class presentations.
It gave mind-blowing stats like:
- 28% of high school students believe that school work is meaningful.
- 21% said interesting.
- 39% believe it will help them to succeed.
Why aren't we using ipods to teach. Ipods can be used in conjunction with podcasts. Podcasts are available for every subject imaginable.
Ok, so while I agree with 98% of this video it made me ask a few of my own questions. Like, what do you do in the poorer districts where computers and ipods aren't the main objective for the day. The bare basics like eating and shelter seem to take priority.
I loved all of the examples the video gave on what the various sources, like texting, podcasts, computers can all be used for but it only gave one live example of how to use it. As a new teacher I wouldn't know how to implement using the cellphone in the classroom. I would have loved more "real" examples. Or places to find them, links to sites, other youtube videos, etc.,
One more thought, it is great that the video points out that students are reading or the 3r's - rigor, relevance and relationships. But it neglects to mention that kids are graduating college and writing cover letters to resumes using the same language they use when texting. It is embarrassing and they should be ashamed. I have received these letters and resumes and immediately throw them out. If I person can't take the time to proof read their own resume I will not take the time to interview them. So I agree with the video that students are reading but how deep are they going or is it surface?
In order to reach today's student we have to speak to them in their language - the
DIGITAL language -
I get that. But I also think there has to be a balance. If there is a power outage or if the ipod/cellphone die, they have know how to do some of the basics without the use of technology. They have to instinctively ask the question "why" or "how" and know how to figure out the answer on their own. Just my two cents.